Topless dueling?
I know it’s a long text but it’s worth the read!
“The most intriguing duel fought between women, and the sole one that featured exposed breasts, took place in August 1892 in Verduz, the capitol of Liechtenstein, between Princess Pauline Metternich and the Countess Kielmannsegg. It has gone down in history as the first “emancipated duel” because all parties involved, including the principals and their seconds were female… Before the proceedings began, the baroness pointed out that many insignificant injuries in duels often became septic due to strips of clothing being driven into the wound by the point of a sword. To counter this danger she prudently suggested that both parties should fight stripped of any garments above the waist. Certainly, Baroness Lubinska was ahead of her time, taking an even more radical take on the (at the time) widely dismissed theories of British surgeon Joseph Lister, who in 1870 revolutionized surgical procedures with the introduction of antiseptic.
With the precautions Baroness Lubinska recommended, the topless women duelists were less likely to suffer from an infection; indeed, it was a smart idea to fight semiclad. Given the practicality of the baroness’ suggestion and the “emancipated” nature of the duel, it was agreed that the women would disrobe—after all, there would be no men present to ogle them. For the women, the decision to unbutton the tops of their dresses was not sexual; it was simply a way of preventing a duel of first blood from becoming a duel to the death.
…
It is humorous that most recounts of this historic event fail to mention two important things: the winner of the duel (Princess Metternich) and the reason why the women came to arms in the first place—they disagreed over the floral arrangements for an upcoming musical exhibition.”
^ best part of the entire article.
Whether or not this is entirely true is debated. This article is from The Terrific Register and was written in 1825 so I doubt the complete veracity of the facts but it’s truly an amusing story.
The duke of Richelieu was the cause of an unprecedented duel between two females, Madame de Polignac and Madame de Nesle, who disputed the possession of him. The duke had repeatedly refused to the see the former, but this was of no avail. Madame de Polignac still loved her inconstant gallant with as much ardour as ever, and was therefore jealous of all the ladies that had succeeded her, not singly, but in troops. Tortured by jealousy, she one day met Madame de Nesle, and challenged her to fight with pistols in the Bois de Boulonge. Madame de Nesle eagerly accepted the challenge, being animated by the same spirit as her fair antagonist, and hoping either to kill her antagonist, and thus remain in undisturbed possession of her lover, or to evince the strength of her attachment, and the ardour of her passion, by an honourable death. The ladies met, and fired at each other. Madame de Nesle fell, and her fair bosom was covered with blood. “Come on,” exclaimed her antagonist, “I will teach you the consequences of robbing a woman like me of her lover; if I had the perfidious creature in my power I would tear out her heart as I have blown out her brains.”
A young man who had heard these cruel words, begged her to moderate herself, and not exult over her unfortunate opponent, whose courage, at least, could not but command her respect. “Silence, young coxcomb,” cried Madame de Polignac, “it does not become you to give me instruction.” *insert snickers at the insults*
Madame de Nesle had not been wounded in the breast, as had first been feared, but very slightly in the shoulder. On coming to herself, some person asked her if the lover, for whose sake she had fought, was worth exposing herself to such a risk for him? “O yes,” replied she, “he deserves much better blood than what circulates in my veins to be shed for him. He is the most amiable man of the whole court; all the ladies lay snares for him; but I hope, after this proof of love which I have given, to obtain the exclusive possession of his heart. I am under too great obligations to you,” continued she, “to conceal his name,——it is the duke de Richelieu; yes, the duke de Richelieu, the first-born of the God of War and the Goddess of Love.”
*dissolves in laughter*
Such a bad photo (and such awful dialogue) but that’s honestly the best I find of either lady (also their clothing isn’t very early 18th century either). The second photo is of the man they fought over. No to point fingers or anything buuuut total popinjay right there! Either way I am loving those red heels!
“In 1552 the exceptional event happened in Napoli: two ladies, Isabella de Carazi and Diambra de Petinella engaged in a duel in the presence of Marquis Del Vast. The duel was held in behalf of a young gentleman named Fabio de Zeresola. The event so shocked the Neapolitans that it was a subject of talks for a long time. This romantic story about dueling young ladies fallen in love with one man inspired the Spanish artist Jose de Ribera during his being in Italy in 1636 to create his masterpiece ”Duel of women” which is one of the most exciting paintings in the gallery “Prado” in Madrid.”
In the chronicles of ladies fencing we have to start out with one Agnes Hotot Dudley and The House of Dudleys of Northamptonshire.
“Among the ancestresses of this Sir William Dudley, one deserves special mention for her personal bravery. Her name was Agnes Hotot, heiress of an ancient and noble family of that name, who claimed to have come over to England with the Conqueror, though their name does not figure on the roll of Battle Abbey.
She was certainly no unworthy daughter of a noble house, and she deserves being held in memory for one deed of gallantry, which stands recorded in a contemporary manuscript penned by a reverend monk, who was vicar of Clapton during the reign of Henry VII. The account runs as follows, the spelling of the manuscript being modernized ‘The father of Agnes Hotot, the great heiress who married Dudley, having a dispute with one Ringsdale about the title to a piece of land, they -the litigants- resolved to meet on the disputed ground, and to decide the affair by single combat. On the day appointed for the encounter at the lists it so happened that Sir John Hotot was laid up with the gout; but his daughter Agnes, rather than that the land should be lost by default, armed herself cap-a-pie, and, mounting her father’s horse, went and encountered Ringsdale, whom she unhorsed after a stubborn contest. When he lay prostrate on the ground, she loosened her throat-latch, lifted up the vizor of her helmet, and let her hair down about her shoulders, thus discovering her sex.”
I found my epee tonight. It’s a bittersweet memento. I fenced competitively for quite a while when I was younger. I lived for the feel of my beautiful Negrini epee casually gripped in my hand and then the call of en garde, that tense feeling of excitement. My poor epee guard has so many battle wounds!
I started researching Ladies fencing in the Edwardian era and then went farther back in the Victorian era. You’ll never believe where I ended up?! In 1348! I thought perhaps I would share my research since it’s quite fascinating!
So, en garde!
Design by Simon Fletcher. Powered by Tumblr.
© Copyright 2010